Response to Speech and Language Therapy According to Artery Involvement and Lesion Location in Post-stroke Aphasia.

PURPOSE: Aphasia is one of the most common complications after stroke and occurs in 21-38% of the patients during acute period. The present study aimed to investigate the response to speech and language therapy according to artery involvement and lesion location in patients with post-stroke aphasia. METHOD: The medical records of 107 patients with post-stroke aphasia (mean age, 58.8 ± 14.8 years) who were admitted to a single rehabilitation center for usual care after stroke were reviewed. Location of the ischemic lesion and involved artery was determined assessing the brain MRI of the patients. All the patients received 24 sessions speech and language therapy (3 days a week) as a part of 8-week rehabilitation program. Evaluation of the aphasia was performed with Gülhane Aphasia Test-2 (GAT-2) at baseline and at the end of the rehabilitation program. RESULTS: Baseline GAT-2 scores was significantly worse in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) involvement compared to patients with other artery involvements (p = 0.007). While the GAT-2 scores of patients with MCA involvement were improved significantly after speech and language therapy (p < 0.001), the changes in those with anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) involvements were not significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggested that speech functions might be more affected in ischemic lesion of MCA and response to SLT might be better in patients with MCA involvement.

Early Brain Imaging Shows Increased Severity of Acute Ischemic Strokes With Large Vessel Occlusion in COVID-19 Patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reports are emerging regarding the association of acute ischemic strokes with large vessel occlusion and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). While a higher severity of these patients could be expected from the addition of both respiratory and neurological injury, COVID-19 patients with strokes can present with mild or none respiratory symptoms. We aimed to compare anterior circulation large vessel occlusion strokes severity between patients with and without COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a comparative cohort study between patients with COVID-19 who had anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and early brain imaging within 3 hours from onset, in our institution during the 6 first weeks of the COVID-19 outbreak and a control group admitted during the same calendar period in 2019. RESULTS: Twelve COVID-19 patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and early brain imaging were included during the study period and compared with 34 control patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and early brain imaging in 2019. Patients in the COVID-19 group were younger (P=0.032) and had a history of diabetes mellitus more frequently (P=0.039). Patients did not significantly differ on initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale nor time from onset to imaging (P=0.18 and P=0.6, respectively). Patients with COVID-19 had more severe strokes than patients without COVID-19, with a significantly lower clot burden score (median: 6.5 versus 8, P=0.016), higher rate of multivessel occlusion (50% versus 8.8%, P=0.005), lower DWI-ASPECTS (Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scores; median: 5 versus 8, P=0.006), and higher infarct core volume (median: 58 versus 6 mL, P=0.004). Successful recanalization rate was similar in both groups (P=0.767). In-hospital mortality was higher in the COVID-19 patients' group (41.7% versus 11.8%, P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Early brain imaging showed higher severity large vessel occlusion strokes in patients with COVID-19. Given the massive number of infected patients, concerns should be raised about the coming neurovascular impact of the pandemic worldwide.

Bilateral posterior cerebral artery territory infarction in a SARS-Cov-2 infected patient: discussion about an unusual case.

In time of SARS-Cov2 pandemic, neurologists need to be vigilant for cerebrovascular complications of Covid-19. We present a case of bilateral occipito-temporal infarction revealed by a sudden cortical blindness with haemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis in a diabetic patient infected by Covid-19. Differential diagnoses are discussed in front of this unusual presentation and evolution.

Severe Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome with Large Posterior Cerebral Infarction.

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome is characterized by thunderclap headache and multifocal cerebral vasoconstriction. Cerebral vasoconstriction is reversible, and most cases have good prognosis. However, clinical outcome is possibly severe when it is complicated by stroke, yet detailed reports on such a case are few. We experienced a case of severe reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in a 32-year-old woman with medical history of preeclampsia 3years prior. She presented with sudden sharp headache followed by altered mental status and vasoconstriction of the bilateral posterior cerebral arteries. She was treated with intravenous and oral calcium channel blockers, edaravone, and glycerol. However, the cerebral infarction in the posterior circulation subsequently remained, and her impaired consciousness did not recover. Furthermore, although imaging findings of vasoconstriction showed improvement a day after the occurrence of symptom, the same vessels showed poor visualization 7 weeks later, which indicated the recurrence of vasoconstriction, without additional symptom due to the fixed infarction. Although most cases of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome show good prognosis, neurologists must monitor the possibility of worse clinical course and permanent neurological deficit when associated with stroke, such as cerebral infarction. Strict management and treatment are needed in these cases.

Etiology and Risk Factors of Posterior Circulation Infarction Compared with Anterior Circulation Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Many clinicians regard posterior circulation infarction (PCI) as different from anterior circulation infarction (ACI), leading them to apply different treatments. Few studies have validated this practice by directly comparing the etiology and risk factors of PCI and ACI. METHODS: We compared the etiology and risk factors of 2245 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of PCI or ACI confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging in the Chengdu Stroke Registry. Stroke etiology in each patient was classified according to Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria. RESULTS: Our sample included 482 patients (21.5%) with PCI and 1763 (78.5%) with ACI. The most frequent etiology for both infarction types was small-artery occlusion, occurring in 37.6% of patients with PCI and 37.1% of those with ACI. Cardioembolism caused infarction in a significantly smaller proportion of patients with PCI (5.4%) than in patients with ACI (13.3%; odds ratio [OR] = .373; 95% confidence interval [CI], .245-.566). Frequencies of other stroke etiologies were similar between the 2 patient groups. Analysis of risk factor frequencies in the 2 groups showed hypertension to be the most common, occurring in 47.9% of patients in either group. Multivariable analysis identified 2 factors as conferring greater risk of PCI than ACI: male gender (OR = 1.392; 95% CI, 1.085-1.786) and diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.667; 95% CI, 1.275-2.180). The same analysis identified 2 factors as conferring greater risk of ACI: atrial fibrillation (OR = .530; 95% CI, .295-.951) and heart valve disease (OR = .433; 95% CI, .203-.922). Frequencies of other possible risk factors were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that PCI and ACI are more similar than different in their etiology and risk factors and that the 2 types of infarction should be treated based more on etiology and risk factors than on their posterior or anterior localization.

Medical and endovascular treatment of patients with large vessel occlusion presenting with mild symptoms: an observational multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of stroke patients presenting with mild symptoms does not have a successful recovery, especially when a large vessel is occluded. IV thrombolysis is safe and may benefit patients presenting with mild symptoms. In this study, we tested whether endovascular therapy (ET) is superior to medical therapy in these patients. METHODS: Observational, prospectively collected, multicenter study of 78 consecutive patients admitted from 2009 to 2012 within 6 h of stroke, with NIHSS≤5 at presentation or during initial diagnostic work-up and large vessel occlusion. Data for patients undergoing ET and/or IV thrombolysis were taken from the SONIIA registry of reperfusion therapies in Catalonia, or from our local stroke registry if no reperfusion therapy was delivered. We compared risk factors, clinical course, collateral circulation, revascularization rates, hemorrhagic complications, infarct volume, and the functional outcome at 3 months of patients treated with ET and those not receiving ET. Ordinal regression was used to assess the independent effect of ET on functional outcome. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar for ET (n=34) and medically (n=44) treated patients, except for older age in the latter. The occlusions were located in the terminal internal carotid artery (1%), M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (33%), M2 segment (30%), posterior circulation (31%), and 5% of the patients had tandem lesions, with no significant differences between groups. Most patients in both treatment groups had good collateral flow. The rate of successful revascularization (91.2 vs. 63.4%; p=0.006) and the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (11.8 vs. 0%; p=0.033) were higher in the ET group. The NIHSS scores were similar at hospital arrival, after initial neuroimaging, and at 24 h in both treatment groups and there were no significant differences in the infarct volume in a follow-up MRI. At 3 months, 35.9% of the patients had some disability. The functional outcome was similar in both treatment groups in univariate analysis and also in models adjusted for age and initial NIHSS or for variables associated to functional outcome on univariate comparison. Conversely, IV thrombolysis was associated with significantly greater chances of full recovery after adjusting for baseline differences (OR 3.70, p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: One third of stroke patients with mild symptoms and large vessel occlusions do not have a successful recovery. ET is effective to recanalize the occluded vessel but increases the risk of serious bleeding significantly without improving the functional outcome, and is therefore not justified routinely in these patients.

[Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke under conscious sedation compared to general anesthesia - safety, feasibility and clinical and radiological outcome]. / Endovaskuläre Therapie des akut ischämischen Schlaganfalls unter Analgosedierung im Vergleich zur Intubationsnarkose - Durchführbarkeit, periprozedurale Sicherheit, klinisches und radiologisches Outcome.

PURPOSE: Vessel recanalization is an important predictor of clinical outcome in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Endovascular therapies are used with increasing frequency. There is no general agreement on the policy of anesthesia during endovascular therapy, ranging from general anesthesia (GA) to local anesthesia at the puncture site with conscious sedation (CS) as needed. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility and radiological and clinical outcome of endovascular stroke therapy under CS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with endovascular therapy over a five-year period. Data was evaluated with respect to type of sedation, conversion from CS to GA, recanalization rate, infarct volume and peri- and post-procedural complications. RESULTS: There was a technical failure in 7 patients. Of the remaining 124 patients (mean age 68.8 ± 14.6 years), 65 were female (52 %). The site of occlusion was located in the anterior circulation in 94 patients (76 %) and in the posterior circulation in 30 cases (24 %). 105 patients (85 %) were treated under CS and 16 cases (13 %) primarily under GA. In 3 cases (2 %) peri-procedural conversion to GA was necessary. Primary intra-arterial thrombolysis, mechanical recanalization only, and combination therapy were performed in 60 (48 %), 27 (22 %) and 37 (30 %) patients, respectively. There were no significant differences for recanalization rate and complications between GA and CS. The mean procedure time was significantly shorter in patients treated under CS (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Endovascular stroke therapy with CS is feasible, can be performed safely and is faster than with GA.

Dide-Botcazo syndrome due to bilateral occlusion of posterior cerebral artery.

Dide-Botcazo syndrome is a rare clinical syndrome characterized by a combination of cortical blindness with anosognosia for blindness, amnesia and topographical disorientation, secondary to bilateral occipital cortex lesions also involving the infero-medial temporal lobe structure. We report a case of a man who acutely presented confusion and cortical blindness. The cerebral angiography demonstrated bilateral occlusion of posterior cerebral artery (PCA). Sequential intravenous (i.v.) and intra-arterial (i.a.) thrombolysis were ineffective and the patient developed a complete Dide-Botcazo syndrome.

Acute, painless vision loss.

This article provides a review of various conditions causing sudden, painless vision loss. The conditions of amaurosis fugax, central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), vitreous hemorrhage, ischemic optic neuropathies (ION), posterior cerebrovascular accidents, and retinal detachment (RD) are discussed. The history, physical, pathophysiology, and treatment of each disease state are discussed along with possible preventative measures for each. An emphasis is made on early ophthalmologic involvement for potential vision restoration and the importance of a thorough history and physical for all patients with ocular complaints.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for stenosis of the posterior cerebral artery in progressive stroke. Case report.

A 59-year-old male presented with repeated transient hemianopsia and hemiparesis on the left. Emergency magnetic resonance angiography showed stenosis of the right posterior cerebral artery (PCA). Endovascular recanalization with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed immediately after the diagnosis. Patency of the PCA was successfully restored. The patient was discharged without neurological deficits. Progressive stroke in the PCA territory is rare. However, emergency endovascular recanalization is possible after prompt clinical diagnosis based on repeated diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and angiography after a 24-hour interval.

Stenting for a symptomatic posterior cerebral artery stenosis.

Evolvement of endovascular devices and increase of operator expertise have made angioplasty and stenting in intracranial vessels technically possible. Stenting has been reported in treating stenosis in middle and anterior cerebral arteries with favorable outcomes. However, the feasibility of stenting for stenosis in posterior cerebral artery (PCA) has not been established. We report a patient with progressive focal cerebral ischemic symptoms, which were arrested after reconstruction of the associated PCA stenosis with stenting.

Arterial brain infarction in complicated acute otitis media.

We report a rare case of acute otitis media (AOM) complicated by arterial brain infarction, meningitis and orbital cellulitis. Computed tomography (CT) initially showed suspected epidural abscess, coalescent mastoiditis, and orbital cellulitis. Further clinical deterioration occurred following mastoidectomy and evacuation of the abscess. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed subacute brain infarction and an extra-axial brainstem abscess. Revision of the initial CT revealed subtle signs suggestive of arterial brain infarction. Although CT with contrast is the standard of care for suspected AOM complications, MRI should be considered as an adjunct when CT is not definitive and neurological signs are present.